Titre du document / Document title

Comparative efficacy and safety of azelastine and levocabastine nasal sprays in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis

Auteur(s) / Author(s)

FALSER Norbert ⁽¹⁾ ; WOBER Wolfgang ⁽²⁾ ; RAHLFS Volker W. ⁽³⁾ ; BAEHRE Martin ⁽⁴⁾ ;

Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)

⁽¹⁾ Ear Nose Throat Specialist Practice, Innsbruck, AUTRICHE
⁽²⁾ Institute for Medical Research, Munich, ALLEMAGNE
⁽³⁾ Idv-Datenanalyse und Versuchsplanung, Gauting/Munich, ALLEMAGNE
⁽⁴⁾ ASTA Medica, Frankfurt/Main, ALLEMAGNE

Résumé / Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of azelastine (CAS 58581-89-8) (1.12 mg/ day) and levocabastine (CAS 79547-78-7) (0.4 mg/day) nasal spray administered twice daily to patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. A total of 180 patients participated in a 4-week, double-blind, parallel group (n = 90 each) study. Symptom severity of nasal, ocular and other symptoms were recorded, out of which a total symptom score (TSS) was calculated. Physicians assessed symptoms at baseline and at days 7, 14, and 28, patients and physicians evaluated the efficacy and tolerability. After 4 weeks of treatment with azelastine the mean overall TSS was reduced from a baseline score of 18.7 to 4.2, after levocabastine from 17.8 to 5.9. Patients morning scores for treatment days 1 to 28 gave a mean total score of 212.4 for the azelastine group and 230.6 for the levocabastine group; the equivalent evening scores yielded a mean total score of 115.5 and 175.6 respectively. Global efficacy was judged by physicians as either 'very good' or 'good' for 90 % of azelastine patients and for 74 % of the levocabastine group; 92 % of azelastine patients and 76 % of levocabastine patients judged treatment to be either 'very good' or good'. No serious adverse events were reported, all adverse events were related to nasal symptoms. Both azelastine and levocabastine administered twice daily as a nasal spray provide effective and well tolerated symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Azelastine, however, was statistically superior in efficacy as well as in safety (PWei-Lachin < 0.0001, combined results).

Revue / Journal Title

Arzneimittel-Forschung   ISSN 0004-4172   CODEN ARZNAD 

Source / Source

2001, vol. 51, n^o5, pp. 387-393 (26 ref.)

Langue / Language

Anglais

Editeur / Publisher

Cantor, Aulendorf, ALLEMAGNE  (1951) (Revue)

Mots-clés anglais / English Keywords

Azelastine ; Antiallergic ; Antihistaminic ; H1 Histamine receptor ; Antagonist ; Levocabastine ; Comparative study ; Chemotherapy ; Rhinitis ; Allergy ; Treatment ; Treatment efficiency ; Human ; Secondary effect ; Nasal form ; Double blind study ; ENT disease ; Nose disease ; Immunopathology ;

Mots-clés français / French Keywords

Azélastine ; Antiallergique ; Antihistaminique ; Récepteur histaminergique H1 ; Antagoniste ; Lévocabastine ; Etude comparative ; Chimiothérapie ; Rhinite ; Allergie ; Traitement ; Efficacité traitement ; Homme ; Effet secondaire ; Forme nasale ; Etude double insu ; ORL pathologie ; Nez pathologie ; Immunopathologie ;

Mots-clés espagnols / Spanish Keywords

Azelastina ; Antialérgico ; Antihistamínico ; Receptor histaminérgico H1 ; Antagonista ; Levocabastina ; Estudio comparativo ; Quimioterapia ; Rinitis ; Alergia ; Tratamiento ; Eficacia tratamiento ; Hombre ; Efecto secundario ; Forma nasal ; Estudio doble ciego ; ORL patología ; Nariz patología ; Inmunopatología ;

Localisation / Location

INIST-CNRS, Cote INIST : 565, 35400009534067.0020