CAT.INIST
Accueil du sitewww.cnrs.frwww.inist.frOther CNRS


COMMANDER / ORDER
PARTAGER / SHARE
EXPORT
Bookmark and Share
Mendeley    EndNote

Titre du document / Document title

Low-dose drug combination therapy : an alternative first-line approach to hypertension treatment

Auteur(s) / Author(s)

PRISANT L. M. (1) ; WEIR M. R. ; PAPADEMETRIOU V. ; WEBER M. A. ; ADGEBILE I. A. ; ALEMAYEHU D. ; LEFKOWITZ M. P. ; CARR A. A. (1) ;

Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)

(1) Medical coll. Georgia, sect. hypertension, Augusta GA 30912-3150, ETATS-UNIS

Résumé / Abstract

To investigate the concept that the initial treatment of hypertension with low doses of two antihypertensives that have different modes of action and additive effects may achieve control of blood pressure and minimize the dose-dependent adverse effects seen with conventional mono-therapy, a randomized, double-blind parallel group dose-escalation study was conducted. After a 4 to 5 week placebo washout period, 218 men and women with diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 114 mm Hg were randomly allocated to take : amlodipine (2.5 to 10 mg), enalapril (5 to 20 mg), and the low-dose combination of bisoprolol (2.5 to 10 mg) with 6.25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). All drugs were administered once daily, titrated to optimal response, and taken for a total of 12 weeks. Blood pressure was measured 24 hours after dose. The response rates (either a diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg or a decrease of diastolic pressure ≥10 mm Hg) were 71% for bisoprolol-6.25 mg HCTZ, 69% for amlodipine, and 45% for enalapril. The mean decreases in systolic/diastolic blood pressure from baseline were 13.4/10.7, 12.8/10.2, and 7.3/6.6 mm Hg for bisoprolol-6.25 mg HCTZ, amlodipine, and enalapril, respectively. The mean change with enalapril was less than the other drugs (p < 0.01), although the once-daily dosing of enalapril and the maximum dose of 20 mg might not have been optimal for this agent. Overall adverse events for bisoprolol-6.25 mg HCTZ, amlodipine, and enalapril were 29%, 42%, and 47% (P = 0.04, bisoprolol-6.25 mg HCTZ vs enalapril), and drug-related adverse events were 16%, 21%, and 23% (no significant difference), respectively. Changes in quality of life scores as measured by the General Well-Being Index were +0.9 for bisoprolol-6.25 mg HCTZ, +0.5 for amlodipine, and -2.3 for enalapril, with a positive change indicating improvement. This study demonstrates that low-dose combination therapy with bisoprolol-6.25 mg HCTZ is effective and well tolerated. Thus low-dose combination therapy appears to be a rational alternative for initiating therapy of mild to moderate hypertension. (AM HEART J 1995 ;130 :359-66.)

Revue / Journal Title

The American heart journal   ISSN 0002-8703   CODEN AHJOA2 

Source / Source

1995, vol. 130, no2, pp. 359-366 (27 ref.)

Langue / Language

Anglais

Editeur / Publisher

Elsevier, New York, NY, ETATS-UNIS  (1925) (Revue)

Mots-clés anglais / English Keywords

Hypertension ; Human ; Chemotherapy ; Antihypertensive agent ; Drug combination ; Treatment ; Low dose ; Thiazide ; Cardiovascular disease ;

Mots-clés français / French Keywords

Hypertension artérielle ; Homme ; Chimiothérapie ; Bisoprolol ; Antihypertenseur ; Association médicamenteuse ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; Traitement ; Dose faible ; Thiazide ; Appareil circulatoire pathologie ;

Mots-clés espagnols / Spanish Keywords

Hipertensión arterial ; Hombre ; Quimioterapia ; Antihipertensivo ; Asociación medicamentosa ; Tratamiento ; Dosis débil ; Tiazida ; Aparato circulatorio patología ;

Localisation / Location

INIST-CNRS, Cote INIST : 2057, 35400005389920.0260

Nº notice refdoc (ud4) : 3632747

COMMANDER / ORDER
PARTAGER / SHARE
EXPORT
Bookmark and Share
Mendeley    EndNote

CAT.INIST