CAT.INIST
Accueil du sitewww.cnrs.frwww.inist.frOther CNRS


   Envoyer le lien de cette référence    Imprimer / Print    Retour / Back

Titre du document / Document title

Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel) : randomized comparison

Auteur(s) / Author(s)

CHUCK F. J. ; HUFFAKER B. J. ;

Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)

Kaiser foundation hosp., dep. obstetrics gynecology, div. maternal-fetal medicine, Los Angeles CA 90027, ETATS-UNIS

Résumé / Abstract

OBJECTIVE : Our purpose was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravaginal prostaglandin E1, misoprostol, with that of intracervical prostaglandin E2 (Prepidil gel) for labor induction. STUDY DESIGN : One hundred three patients with an indication for induction of labor were randomly assigned to induction with prostaglandin E1, 50 μg intravaginally, or with Prepidil gel, 0.5 mg intracervically, every 4 hours until active labor. RESULTS : Four patients were excluded, leaving 49 patients who received prostaglandin E1 and 50 who received prostaglandin E2. The time from start of induction to vaginal delivery was significantly shorter in the prostaglandin E1 group (11.4 vs 18.9 hours, p < 0.001), and fewer patients in the prostaglandin E1 group required oxytocin augmentation (23% vs 55%, p < 0.005). No significant differences were noted in mode of delivery or in adverse maternal, fetal, or neonatal effects. CONCLUSION : Intravaginal prostaglandin E1 is a more effective, lower-cost agent for induction of labor than is intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel and is comparable in safety.

Revue / Journal Title

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology   ISSN 0002-9378   CODEN AJOGAH 

Source / Source

Congrès
Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. Annual meeting No15, Atlanta GA , ETATS-UNIS (23/01/1995)
1995, vol. 173, no4, pp. 1137-1142 (20 ref.)

Langue / Language

Anglais

Editeur / Publisher

Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, ETATS-UNIS  (1920) (Revue)

Mots-clés anglais / English Keywords

Delivery ; Triggering ; Induction ; Route of administration ; Prostaglandin E1 ; Prostaglandin E2 ; Colloidal gel ; Endocervix ; Human ; Female ; Complication ; Chemotherapy ;

Mots-clés français / French Keywords

Accouchement ; Déclenchement ; Induction ; Voie administration ; Prostaglandine E1 ; Prostaglandine E2 ; Gel colloïdal ; Endocol utérus ; Homme ; Femelle ; Complication ; Chimiothérapie ;

Mots-clés espagnols / Spanish Keywords

Parto ; Inducción ; Inducción ; Vía administración ; Prostaglandina E1 ; Prostaglandina E2 ; Gel coloidal ; Endocervix ; Hombre ; Hembra ; Complicación ; Quimioterapia ;

Localisation / Location

INIST-CNRS, Cote INIST : 3053, 35400005874368.0240

Nº notice refdoc (ud4) : 2911208

   Envoyer le lien de cette référence    Imprimer / Print    Retour / Back


Custom Search