Titre du document / Document title
Pharmacokinetic overview of oral second-generation H
1 antihistamines
Auteur(s) / Author(s)
GONZALEZ M. A.
(1) ;
ESTES K. S.
(1) ;
Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)
(1) P'Kinetics Inc., Pembroke Pines, Florida and Division of Endocrinology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, ETATS-UNIS
Résumé / Abstract
Specific H
1 antihistamines have become the standard of treatment for relief of symptoms associated with seasonal allergic rhinitis. First-generation antihistamines are small lipophilic molecules that are associated with numerous adverse events largely because of their propensity to cross the blood-brain barrier and their cholinergic activity. Second-generation antihistamines, being more lipophobic, offer the advantages of a lack of CNS and cholinergic effects such as sedation and dry mouth, which are commonly seen in first-generation antihistamines. Their longer duration of action also enables a more patient-friendly dosing regimen which increases patient compliance. This paper reviews the pharmacokinetic properties of these second-generation agents and is intended to provide comparisons that help explain differences in dosing profiles and drug interactions for members of this class of drugs. With the announced withdrawal of terfenadine from the U.S. market in early 1997, 4 second-generation antihistamines are currently widely available: astemizole, loratadine, cetirizine, and fexofenadine. Terfenadine and astemizole both produce significant cardiac QT interval prolongation that may progress to a rare but fatal cardiac ventricular tachycardia known as torsades de pointes. While only terfenadine has been withdrawn due to its adverse effects profile, significant warnings were recently issued for astemizole. The pharmacokinetic profiles of loratadine and cetirizine are reflective of the advantages of these agents as non-cardiotoxic antihistamines. With respect to the newest agent fexofenadine, the major metabolite of terfenadine, published reports are minimal, but its pharmacokinetics differs from that of terfenadine.
Revue / Journal Title
International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
ISSN 0946-1965
Source / Source
1998, vol. 36, n
o5, pp. 292-300 (43 ref.)
Langue / Language
Anglais
Editeur / Publisher
Dustri, München, ALLEMAGNE
(1994)
(Revue)
Mots-clés anglais / English Keywords
Cetirizine ;
Loratadine ;
Astemizole ;
Terfenadine ;
Fexofenadine ;
Antihistaminic ;
Antagonist ;
H1 Histamine receptor ;
Pharmacokinetics ;
Human ;
Review ;
Oral administration ;
Mots-clés français / French Keywords
Cétirizine ;
Loratadine ;
Astémizole ;
Terfénadine ;
Fexofénadine ;
Antihistaminique ;
Antagoniste ;
Récepteur histaminergique H1 ;
Pharmacocinétique ;
Homme ;
Article synthèse ;
Voie orale ;
Mots-clés espagnols / Spanish Keywords
Cetirizina ;
Loratadina ;
Astemizol ;
Terfenadina ;
Fexofenadina ;
Antihistamínico ;
Antagonista ;
Receptor histaminérgico H1 ;
Farmacocinética ;
Hombre ;
Artículo síntesis ;
Vía oral ;
Localisation / Location
INIST-CNRS, Cote INIST : 15902, 35400007597066.0100
Nº notice refdoc (ud4) : 2258921