Titre du document / Document title
Maternal glycemic control and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetic pregnancy : A randomized trial of insulin aspart versus human insulin in 322 pregnant women
Auteur(s) / Author(s)
The Insulin Aspart Pregnancy Study Group
MATHIESEN Elisabeth R.
(1) ;
KINSLEY Brendan
(2) ;
AMIEL Stephanie A.
(3) ;
HELLER Simon
(4) ;
MCCANCE David
(5) ;
DURAN Santiago
(6) ;
BELLAIRE Shannon
(7) ;
RABEN Anne
(7) ;
Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)
(1) Department of Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, DANEMARK
(2) Department of En docrinology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Dublin, Dublin, IRLANDE
(3) Diabetes Research Group, Kings College School of Medicine, London, ROYAUME-UNI
(4) Northem General Hospital, Sheffield, ROYAUME-UNI
(5) Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, ROYAUME-UNI
(6) Unidad de Investigacion Diabetes, Hospital Virgen de Valme, Seville, ESPAGNE
(7) Novo Nordisk, Copenhagen, DANEMARK
Résumé / Abstract
OBJECTIVE - To assess the safety and efficacy of insulin aspart (IAsp) versus regular human insulin (HI) in basal-bolus therapy with NPH insulin in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Subjects (n = 322) who were pregnant or planning pregnancy were randomized to IAsp or HI as meal-time insulin in an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. Subjects had A1C ≤8% at confirmation of pregnancy. Insulin doses were titrated toward predefined glucose targets and A1C <6.5%. Outcomes assessed included risk of major maternal hypoglycemia, A1C, plasma glucose profiles, and maternal safety outcomes. RESULTS- Major hypoglycemia occurred at a rate of 1.4 vs. 2.1 episodes/year exposure with IAsp and HI, respectively (relative risk 0.720 [95% CI 0.36-1.46]). Risk of major/major nocturnal hypoglycemia was 52% (RR 0.48 [0.20-1.143]; P = NS) lower with IAsp compared with HI. A1C was comparable with human insulin in second (IAsp-HI -0.04 [-0.18 to 0.11]) and third (-0.08 [-0.23 to 0.06]) trimesters. A total of 80% of subjects achieved an A1C <6.5%. At the end of first and third trimesters, average postprandial plasma glucose increments were significantly lower with IAsp than HI (P = 0.003 and P = 0.044, respectively), as were mean plasma glucose levels 90 min after breakfast (P = 0.044 and P = 0.001, respectively). Maternal safety profiles and pregnancy outcomes were similar between treatments. CONCLUSIONS - IAsp is at least as safe and effective as HI when used in basal-bolus therapy with NPH insulin in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and may potentially offer some benefits in terms of postprandial glucose control and preventing severe hypoglycemia.
Revue / Journal Title
Diabetes care
ISSN 0149-5992
CODEN DICAD2
Source / Source
2007, vol. 30, n
o4, pp. 771-776 [6 page(s) (article)] (39 ref.)
Langue / Language
Anglais
Editeur / Publisher
American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, VA, ETATS-UNIS
(1978)
(Revue)
Mots-clés anglais / English Keywords
Immunopathology ;
Autoimmune disease ;
Endocrinopathy ;
Metabolic diseases ;
Woman ;
Adult ;
Human ;
Comparative study ;
Insulin aspart ;
Randomization ;
Clinical trial ;
Insulin human ;
Female ;
Pregnancy ;
Type 1 diabetes ;
Glycemia ;
Mother ;
Hypoglycemia ;
Mots-clés français / French Keywords
Immunopathologie ;
Maladie autoimmune ;
Endocrinopathie ;
Métabolisme pathologie ;
Femme ;
Adulte ;
Homme ;
Etude comparative ;
Insuline asparte ;
Randomisation ;
Essai clinique ;
Insuline humaine ;
Femelle ;
Gestation ;
Diabète type 1 ;
Glycémie ;
Mère ;
Hypoglycémie ;
Mots-clés espagnols / Spanish Keywords
Inmunopatología ;
Enfermedad autoinmune ;
Endocrinopatía ;
Metabolismo patología ;
Mujer ;
Adulto ;
Hombre ;
Estudio comparativo ;
Insulina asparta ;
Aleatorización ;
Ensayo clínico ;
Insulina humana ;
Hembra ;
Gestación ;
Diabetes de tipo 1 ;
Glucemia ;
Madre ;
Hipoglicemia ;
Localisation / Location
INIST-CNRS, Cote INIST : 18054, 35400014351614.0010
Nº notice refdoc (ud4) : 18683236