RefDoc
Haut

Faire une nouvelle recherche
Make a new search
Lancer la recherche


Titre du document / Document title

Natural selection and the conditions for existence : Representational vs. conditional teleology in biological explanation

Auteur(s) / Author(s)

REISS John O. (1) ;

Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)

(1) Dept. of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, ETATS-UNIS

Résumé / Abstract

Human intentional action, including the design and use of artifacts involves the prior mental representation of the goal (end) and the means to achieve that goal. This representation is part of the efficient cause of the action, and thus can be used to explain both the action and the achievement of the end. This is intentional teleological explanation. More generally, teleological explanation that depends on the real existence of a representation of the goal (and the means to achieve it) can be called representational teleological explanation. Such explanations in biology can involve both external representations (e.g., ideas in the mind of God) and internal representations (souls, vital powers, entelechies, developmental programs, etc.). However, another type of explanation of intentional action (or any other process) is possible. Given that an action achieving a result occurs, the action can be explained as fulfilling the necessary conditions (means) for that result (end), and, reciprocally, the result explained by the occurrence of those necessary conditions. This is conditional teleological explanation. For organisms, natural selection is often understood metaphorically as the designer, intentionally constructing them for certain ends. Unfortunately, this metaphor is often taken rather too literally, because it has been difficult to conceive of another way to relate natural selection to the process of evolution. I argue that combining a conditional teleological explanation of organisms and of evolution provides such an alternative. This conditional teleology can be grounded in existence or survival. Given that an organism exists, we can explain its existence by the occurrence of the necessary conditions for that existence. This principle of the 'conditions for existence' was introduced by Georges Cuvier in 1800, and provides a valid, conditional teleological method for explaining organismal structure and behavior. From an evolutionary perspective, the conditions for existence are the range of boundary conditions within which the evolutionary process must occur. Moreover, evolutionary change itself can be subjected to conditional teleological explanation, because natural selection theory is primarily a theory about the relation between the conditions for the existence of organisms and the conditions for the existence of traits in populations. I show that failure to distinguish representational from conditional teleological explanation has confused previous attempts to clarify the relation of teleology to biology.

Revue / Journal Title

History and philosophy of the life sciences    ISSN  0391-9714 

Source / Source

2005, vol. 27, no2, pp. 249-280 [32 page(s) (article)] (1 p.1/4)

Langue / Language

Anglais
Revue : Anglais

Editeur / Publisher

Giannini, Napoli, ITALIE  (1979) (Revue)

Mots-clés anglais / English Keywords

Evolution

;

Mots-clés français / French Keywords

Evolution

;

Mots-clés espagnols / Spanish Keywords

Evoluciňn

;

Localisation / Location

INIST-CNRS, Cote INIST : 24533, 35400014243126.0030

Nº notice refdoc (ud4) : 17896617



Faire une nouvelle recherche
Make a new search
Lancer la recherche
Bas