Titre du document / Document title
Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm : A Selective Accessibility model
Auteur(s) / Author(s)
MUSSWEILER T. (1) ;
STRACK F. (2) ;
Affiliation(s) du ou des auteurs / Author(s) Affiliation(s)
(1) Northwestern University, ETATS-UNIS
(2) Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, ALLEMAGNE
Résumé / Abstract
Results of four studies support the notion that anchoring effects are mediated by mechanisms of hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming. According to the suggested Selective Accessibility Model, judges use a hypothesis-consistent test strategy to solve a comparative anchoring task. Applying this strategy selectively increases the accessibility of anchor-consistent knowledge which is then used to generate the subsequent absolute judgment. Studies 1 and 2 demonstrate that absolute estimates depend on the hypothesis implied in the comparative task, suggesting that a hypothesis-testing strategy is used to solve this task. Study 3 shows that limiting the amount of knowledge generated for the comparative task retards absolute judgments. This suggests that knowledge rendered easily accessible in the comparative judgment is used for the subsequent absolute judgment. Finally, Study 4 suggests that self-generation of knowledge contributes to the robustness of the effect, thus resolving the seeming inconsistency that anchoring effects are at the same time remarkably robust and mediated by typically fragile semantic priming mechanisms.
Revue / Journal Title
Journal of experimental social psychology
ISSN
0022-1031
CODEN JESPAQ
Source / Source
1999, vol. 35, n
o2, pp. 136-164 (3 p.1/4)
Langue / Language
Anglais
Editeur / Publisher
Elsevier, New York, NY, ETATS-UNIS
(1965)
(Revue)
Mots-clés anglais / English Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
Mots-clés français / French Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
Mots-clés espagnols / Spanish Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
Localisation / Location
INIST-CNRS, Cote INIST : 13008, 35400007420517.0020
Nº notice refdoc (ud4) : 1687916